Five common assumptions to test with a pilot, written policy, actual reports, and clear device requirements—not an undocumented survey.
A correction to the original article
The previous version was framed as a survey of 50 contractors but did not publish a methodology or respondent record. That framing has been removed. The points below are questions a fleet should test with its own data.
Myth 1: Tracking automatically damages trust
Poor disclosure damages trust. A written policy, clear business purpose, limited access, and a fair correction process are more useful than surprise monitoring.
Myth 2: Every fleet saves the same percentage
Savings depend on the baseline. A fleet with little idling and tight routing may see a different result than a fleet with frequent exceptions. Measure before and after.
Myth 3: Location is only for catching employees
Location data can support dispatch, arrival questions, route review, maintenance, theft response, and after-hours alerts. Accountability is only one use case.
Myth 4: Every tracker is basically the same
Reporting behavior, cellular support, backup power, alert processing, installation, exports, and support vary. Test the hardware in representative vehicles and locations.
Myth 5: Installing hardware finishes the project
Hardware creates data. A useful result requires alert thresholds, review ownership, driver communication, and a routine for acting on exceptions.
Source
Editorial standard
Reviewed July 12, 2026 by the Track My Truck Product Team. No contractor survey result is claimed.